References

  • Bovens, L. and Hartmann, S. (2003) Bayesian Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
  • Crupi, V., Tentori, K. and Gonzalez, M. (2007) On Bayesian measures of evidential support: Theoretical and empirical issues. Philosophy of Science 74: 229-252
  • Crupi, V., and Tentori, K. (2012) A second look at the logic of explanatory power. Philosophy of Science 79: 365-385
  • De Langhe, R. and Grei, M. (2010) Standards and the distribution of cognitive labour: A model of the dynamics of scientific activity. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 18: 278-94
  • De Langhe, R. (2014) A unified model of the division of cognitive labor. Philosophy of Science 81: 444-459
  • Douven, I., Horsten, L. and Romeijn, J. (2010) Probabilist antirealism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91: 38-63
  • Douven, I., and Verbrugge, S. (2010) The Adams family. Cognition 117: 302-318
  • Douven, I., and Romeijn, J. (2011) A new resolution of the Judy Benjamin Problem. Mind 120: 637-670
  • Douven, I. (2012) Learning conditional information. Mind & Language 27: 239-263
  • Hartmann, S., and Meijs, W. (2012) Walter the banker: The conjunction fallacy reconsidered. Synthese 184: 73-87
  • Hartmann, S. and Sprenger, J. (2012) Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth. Synthese 187: 209-221
  • Hartmann, S. and Rafiee-Rad, S. (2012) Updating on conditionals = Kullback-Leibler divergence + causal structure. Manuscript under review.
  • Leitgeb, H., and Pettigrew, R. (2010) An objective justification of Bayesianism I: Measuring inaccuracy. Philosophy of Science 77: 201-235
  • Leitgeb, H., and Pettigrew, R. (2010) An objective justification of Bayesianism II: The consequences of minimizing inaccuracy. Philosophy of Science 77: 236-272
  • Leitgeb, H. (2012) A probabilistic semantics for counterfactuals. Part A. Review of Symbolic Logic 5: 16-84.
  • Martini, C., Sprenger, J. and Colyvan, M. (2013) Resolving disagreement through mutual respect. Erkenntnis 78: 881-898
  • Mayo-Wilson, C., Zollman, K. and Danks, D. (2011) The Independence Thesis: When individual and social epistemology diverge. Philosophy of Science 78(4): 657-677
  • Olsson, E. (2005) Against coherence: Truth, probability, and justification. Oxford University Press
  • Olsson, E. (2011) A simulation approach to veritistic social epistemology. Episteme 8: 127-143
  • Olsson, E. (2013) A Bayesian simulation model of group deliberation and polarization. In Bayesian Argumentation, ed. Frank Zenker, Berlin: Springer
  • Pettigrew, R. (2012) Accuracy, chance, and the Principal Principle. Philosophical Review 121: 241-275
  • Proietti, C., and Olsson, E. (2014) A DDL approach to pluralistic ignorance and collective belief. Journal of Philosophical Logic 43: 499-515
  • Romeijn, J., and Atkinson, D. (2011) A Condorcet jury theorem for unknown juror competence. Philosophy, Politics and Economics 10: 237-262
  • Schupbach, J., and Sprenger, J. (2011) The logic of explanatory power. Philosophy of Science 78: 105-127
  • Sprenger, J., and Heesen, R. (2011) The bounded strength of weak expectations. Mind 120: 819-832
  • Vallinder, A. and Olsson, E. (2012) Does computer simulation support the argument from disagreement? Synthese 184: 387-405
  • Zollman, K. (2007) The communication structure of epistemic communities. Philosophy of Science 74(5): 574-587
  • Zollman, K. (2012) Social network structure and the achievement of consensus. Politics, Philosophy, and Economics 11: 26-44
Advertisements